Friday, 25 January 2008

"Arab" is the new Jew

(aka "Muslim is the new Jew")


I saw a nice programme yesterday, an episode of the series
Who do you think you are?, about the actress Julia Sawalha's quest for her ancestors. (Her father, the renowned actor Nadim Sawalha, was born in Jordan.)

At a certain point, after filming a group of Beduins in the Jordanian desert, the actress recounted how one of the Beduins asked her, earnestly, whether they (= the crew) were 'making another film that would show that Arabs or Muslims were all terrorists and they should be shot, all of them'. (I am paraphrasing, but it's close enough.)
Of course Sawalha assured him that they were doing no such thing and promised to send him a copy of the programme. 'But he looked me in the eyes, so deeply, as if he weren't quite sure' (= whether she was telling the truth about the intended "message" of the programme), she said.

I felt that was so sad.

What's even sadder, this reticence about Arabs/Muslims is not at all surprising. On a global level I started noticing it - as did you, I am sure - soon after September 11, 2001 (OT: I really wish the Americans would stop calling it "nine-eleven"...), when a little boy in the USA was viciously attacked because he was a Muslim (or maybe just perceived as one, not that it matters).

On a personal level, I've been struck and saddened by this phenomenon ever since I "met" somebody on a philosophy message board. He liked what I had written and told me so in a very kind personal message. I was very glad to receive that message; but, being a friendly gal myself, I made a remark (a very kind one) about the meaning of his nickname which, I had noticed, was Arabic. I am not sure what exactly his feelings were, but by the serious (still kind) tone of his reply I realised that he didn't appreciate the attention I had paid to his nickname, shifting it away from the philosophy debate; that he wasn't sure about my attitude towards him; that he was maybe disappointed by the fact that I had noticed his Arabic nickname.


I wasn't offended (of course) or even embarrassed - but I did feel great sorrow. I felt deeply sorry for him; I felt sorry for all Arabs and/or Muslims (no, it's not the same - and that's part of the problem) that they should be forced to screen every single sentence or remark for possible indications of a generalised contempt - or worse - for Arabs/Muslims. And I felt sorry for myself, and for all of us, that the world has come to this.

What's even more disturbing is the openness I've been noticing lately (on message boards and other such public forums) with which those who "don't like" Arabs and/or Muslims express their opinions. So, not even the present-day political correctness (which I normally loathe) can protect people of Arabic origin or Muslim faith against open hostility, based solely on their "race" and/or faith...?

That is alarming.

And because I refuse to live in such a world - even though I have to - here I am, writing about it: because writing is a parallel life ("I write, therefore I think") - or rather, a substitute for life, an Ersatz living, if you fancy fancy words.


INSERT INTERRUPTION HERE...



Judging by the sound of it, my PC is about to take off...
(I can tell it will fly - through the window - if it doesn't shut up.)
I can't work like this; I'll end this post tomorrow.
Or the day after.

Or - hey, this is a good idea! - YOU can end it for me... :)


P.S. It's the day after and the PC is still unseemly loud. I cannot be inspired to write under such circumstances. But, luckily, other people are interested in the (more or less) same topic, so here's an interesting article about the perception of Arabs among "Soviet" Jews in Israel:


My poor cousin, my feared enemy




And speaking of flying...


A zeppelin over the Tower of David,
Jerusalem
, April 11, 1931



Now there's a photograph the likes of which you don't see everyday.

If you love it, like we do, then you'll love the blog from which it was taken:





Tuesday, 22 January 2008

Thank God for Carla Bruni


or

THE EXEMPLARY VALUE OF A FABULOUS LIFE


If you entertain at least a passing interest in »current events«, you would have heard of her by now: the future – or present? – First Lady of France.

A woman whose life is, literally, the stuff of fairy tales.

In case you don't know Carla Bruni, picture a woman who is widely considered a beauty, a seductress – a »muse«, even; who has earned millions upon millions – not to mention the adoration of fans worldwide – for her looks alone, living a glamorous life in some of the most beautiful places of the world; who is highly intelligent and sophisticated and very well-read.

A woman who has lived a life of leisure and luxury – still does, and has done so from the day she was born. Hers is no rags-to-riches story, she is no »white trash«: she was born in a very rich and very cultured family, she grew up in palaces, scented parks, the glitter of European metropoles, and was afforded the best possible education.



P1050275 Il magnifico parco del Castello


In her later life as an international glamour girl, she has met and dated (and dumped) a long line of very high-profile, very talented, very interesting and often very »eligible« men.

She exchanged her life as one of the very few »supermodels« for a successful career as a singer.

And now (well, last November), she met the recently divorced president of France – and is going to marry him.


P1050283 Il curatissimo giardino all'italiana


Do you hate her yet...? ;)


Her name caught my attention because I actually remembered her from before. I've never been into »supermodels« and such, but I was never a militant grey mouse either, let alone a »grunge«, and I worked in the media, so, naturally, I became somewhat acquainted with her name and career.
In fact, it was a single programme what sparked my lasting (albeit dormant, until now) interest in her. I don't remember the title, but it was a mid-1990s series of »portraits« of supermodels. She talked about her papà. 'Everything I did, I did for daddy,' she said, with a peculiar smile. Pap
à Bruni-Tedeschi, one of the richest industrials in Northern Italy (which is the richest part of Italy) and heir to a historically illustrious name, died in 1996; and by that time it had surfaced that he wasn't really her papà, not biologically – but that, as painful as it must have been for her, seems only a minor flaw in the miraculous tableau of her life.
(And, after all, the biological papà is also a millionaire. Why does it matter? I am not sure; but according to a certain newspaper, allegedly quoting Carla's mamma – a highly-regarded concert pianist – that's what Carla said: that 'Fate had smiled on her', so she has 'two millionaire fathers'. I don't know if it's true; and unless you are Carla – or the mamma – most likely you don't know either.)

I remember that programme and those words about her papà, because it all sounded like an enchanted life to me – the enchanted life I could have had myself (but didn't); and because I, too, would have done a lot for my own papà... had things – or I – and papà – been better. Or just wiser. Less childlike. Less childish.

So, when her name surfaced again a few weeks ago, my interest in her was reignited and I took time to examine that fairy tale life in detail.

Most of it was just as good – or better – than I had remembered or imagined it.

Born into a multi-millionaire family, bearing a historic name (and it's not a bad sounding name, either; its sound is very melodious, not like, say, Pappafava, or even Testaferrata, ancient as they may be), the daughter of a very rich but also very cultured man (papà Bruni composed operas and created a very respectable art and antiques collection) and a well-known concert pianist (I know, I am repeating myself – bear with me: nice things deserve repeating), Carla grew up in palatial surroundings. (And, according to her older sister – who is a bona fide cinematic success in her own right – she was ever the budding femme fatale, even as a little girl. Which is important, because it's never too early to acquire power over men. OK, maybe it is... but 'too early' is still better than never.)

At the Bruni-Tedeschi home(s), where she grew up with her two siblings, apparently in harmony, cosy family soirees included merry sing-alongs with the likes of Maria Callas and other musical luminaries.


P1050300 Panoramica del Castello e dependance

When Carla was five, the family relocated – for safety reasons – from the castle at Chivasso (Castagneto Po, near Turin) to France, where they divided their time between a villa in the south of France and Paris. After the appropriate period at a »finishing school« (in Switzerland – where else?), by which time she had probably acquired at least an extra language in addition to Italian and French, she took up the study of architecture at the Sorbonne... until her brother's girlfriend talked her into becoming a model.

And so she did. Not a model, mind you – a SUPERmodel. She had the luck of belonging to the first generation of models who ascended (hence the super-) to the then-new category: models who were famous in their own right; girls who were, basically, famous for being beautiful and rich (which they became by being beautiful). Glamorous and handsomely paid jet-setters.
Very soon, Carla didn't need daddy's money (not that he was ever stingy): she earned up to 7 millions dollars (plus change) in a single year.
And yet she stood out even among that very small elite of tall, willowy beauties who – let's admit it
- raked in fabulous amounts for showing up more or less fabulously made-up and dressed up and then being fabulously photographed by fabulous photographers. On fabulous locations, by the way.

You think I am making fun of her...?
Perish the thought!


In fact, Carla was the only one who ever admitted – and she did so with relish, with real, mouth-watering gusto – that her life, a supermodel's life, was just that: fabulous.

I think it was that – not the admission itself, but the pleasure that she took in it – what engraved her in my memory, if I may use that antiquated but very à propos expression. Yes, indeed: her life was a fairy tale. Why shouldn't she enjoy that fact? Why should she hide that very public fact from the public?

Yes, I know...

And she knows it, too: to prevent, or at least alleviate, the pangs of bitterness of people whose lives aren't so picture-perfect – whose lives are, in fact, very far from picture-perfect (unless it's a mug shot).

But she didn't and she doesn't hide it.

And her admission does bring out into the open the fact that there are, after all, people who want it all – and have it all. All the time.

And that's the outrageous crime of Carla Bruni: that – not her affairs with married men, not her self-assured »coolness«, not her ambition, not her glamour, not even her relentlessly sunny (yeah, right) life of privilege...

It's her »flaunting« that God-given position of extraordinary privilege that people seem to resent.
(If you don't think they resent her... browse around the WWW.)

But what does flaunting really mean?

At the risk of rubbing it in even further, I propose we go back (don't worry: it is strictly for edifying purposes) and review her attitude.

Here's a woman who, literally, has it »all«.

(It doesn't really matter whether you like her life-style, or moral values or appearance or whatever. I, for example, find her certainly striking and attractive, but not necessarily my ideal of »beauty«. It doesn't matter; what matters is that, from HER perspective, she really does have it »all«.)


All she does is admit it.

She openly admits that she has had a charmed life: that she was born into an extremely rich and respected family, one with very high cultural values and not extraordinarily dysfunctional; that she did grow up in luxury, traveling around the world, soaking up refinement and culture since day one; that she was very well-educated, both by superior learning and by the inclination of her natural curiosity; that she is considered beautiful or very seductive (or both) by very many people around the world, notably by some of the most visible pop »icons« of the 20th century; what's more, that for her looks alone she did earn in a s single year infinitely more money than most people will ever see in their lifetime.; that she is intelligent and highly educated; that she is successful in whatever she does... That she has done whatever she wanted to – and did succeed in everything she did, be it a new career (singing) or a new man. And that now, she is to be – maybe is already – the First Lady of France.

What is she supposed to say when people interview her about her life?
Admit to all of the above, but concentrate on moaning and lamenting the loss – the very tragic loss – that, sooner or later, befalls every single human being who's had a family or friends? How would that look to the same people who now begrudge her »boasting«? How would her lamenting the heartbreak in her life look to all those who resent her »riches« because they live in misery (real or perceived) – and they also had to, or will have to, go through the same kind of heartbreak, only in materially much less comfortable circumstances?

But in reality, deep down, people do not resent her.

They – the child in each one of them – resent the incomprehensible »unfairness« of life that most people are confronted with from day one. They mourn the pure and joyful hopes they had, that were crushed by the reality of everyday life.

Many such people then turn to The Secret (TM) and other such self-help books. They look them up with great hopes, and it is with great hopes that they start with whatever the »program« is... And a few months later their life is the same and they are the »same« - only not really: they are perhaps a tad more cynical, a tad more desperate.

And they resent the people who do make it all the more.

Were their hopes really too »unrealistic«?

Or was it, perhaps, that they do not really believe they can make it – no, not really. Not all the way. Not all the way to that place where they feel they should belong.

Because there is no way that one person could go for it all, have it all... not without provoking the wrath of gods.

I suppose that's why the »(wo)man on the street« has such a profound, almost incomprehensible attachment to, say, Marilyn Monroe: the queen bee of losers.
A woman who couldn't handle the piece of pie – admittedly a huge one! – that was handed to her after a not-so-perfect childhood and adolescence, plagued by mental illness, abandonment, and even hunger.

And that's why so many shower their questionable love on another »Cinderella«, a hilariously rich and spoilt (but prone to slumming) one: Diana Spencer, Princess of Wales. She redeemed herself for the privilege of her life by her opportunely early marital dysfunction and »suffering« (the quotation marks are not meant to minimise anyone's suffering – they just point to the fact that nobody really knows much about other people's feelings) – and, of course, her tragic and very early death, at the same, almost-Christlike age as Monroe: thirty-six.

But Carla Bruni is well past thirty-six now - and shows no intention of slowing down or redeeming herself for anything in any way: she just goes on and on, higher and higher... First pretty rich girl, then even richer pretty girl, and now... First Lady of France?! Living in the Elysée Palace, smack in the centre of Paris, dining with statesmen, dancing with crowned heads?!


Doesn't it make you want to cheer...? :)

I know I am rooting for her.

I am rooting for her to pick yet another – and another, and another – golden apple from the bough.

My goals in life are probably not the same as hers.
Or yours.

It doesn't matter.

I am rooting for her, as I am rooting for myself - and for my own »impossible« dreams. Because I know, as I've always known, that there are no impossible dreams (and if you only knew how impossible mine would seem to any »reasonable« person!).

And if you happen to be one of those endless thousands who seem to be reading, or are going to read, books such as The Secret, then you should give thanks to your deity of choice for the example of Carla Bruni.

The example of her life is worth more than a thousand books. Her life has an almost biblical exemplary value: it shows that anything (desirable) really is possible – in a single lifetime, too. That reaching for the stars, whatever they are, isn't crazy. That you are entitled to want it all – and have it all.

That charmed lives really can exist.

Of course not everyone is born under such lucky stars as Carla Bruni; in fact, very few are. But you are living your life from now on, not from beyond the graves of your ancestors on. So take a thorough look of Carla's splendid life, marred – or should I say ennobled? - only by the inevitable (loss to a greater power, a power that transcends all things human), review it as if it were your own... and if you feel your heart rejoice, I say you have a pretty good chance in succeeding yourself, in securing your own lasting happiness.

It's not a magic trick, it's not a superstition: it just means that you are, after all, able to acknowledge that having it »all« – whatever that means to you - really is possible.


Do I idolise Carla Bruni?

God, no! :)

I idolise nobody, with the possible exception of my grandfather (whom I never really knew).


I am not even her »fan«.
(And you can bet I am no Marilyn Monroe's or Diana's fan, either.)


Do I admire her?

Yes and no.

If I admire her, it's not because of any of the circumstances described above, of course. After all, I cannot admire her for the magnificent hand she's been dealt at birth.

But I do admire her determination to go as far as she can with what she was given; to get away with as much as she possibly (or even impossibly) can – all that by perfectly legal and even morally acceptable means.
(Well, yes: husbands cannot be »stolen«, boyfriends don't leave – certainly not for good - unless
they feel tempted to. And being considered beautiful or charming or seductive is an asset – a perfectly legal one - even in these oh-so-politically correct times.)

But most of all, I admire her gratitude: to life, to fate, to God... whatever she believes in.

For that's what it is, the »flaunting«. It's open acknowledgment that not every one is so lucky – that, in fact, very very few are so lucky.

And that, my friend, is sheer gratitude.

And gratitude is humility.

In fact, gratitude may very well be the noblest form of humility – the one that is most pleasing to God, if you believe in God.

So, think twice, my friend, before you reject other people's praise of your physique, of your intelligence, of your accomplishments, or even put yourself down before other people, feigning »modesty« and »humility« - when in fact you're demeaning (if only in words) something for what you have no merit at all. It's been given to you: by your parents, by »fate«, by God.

Accept it with joy and gratitude – and aim for Sun and the Moon and the stars.
That's why it's been given to you.

And do not resent, let alone badmouth, the Carla Brunis of this world for having done so themselves.


Do you hate me yet...? ;)


P1050269 Balaustra in cotto verso il parco




Thursday, 17 January 2008

BREAKING NEWS! BREAKING NEWS ! BREAKING NEWS!



NOTHING HAPPENED - AND WE WANT YOU TO HEAR ALL ABOUT IT, ALL DAY LONG, EVERY HOUR, ON THE HOUR!



Sky News just went from useless (unless you're a Madeleine McCann fanatic) to... well, uselesser. (Or use-less, as far as this spectator goes. Gotta love them words... :))

There was an »incident« at Heathrow airport earlier today. Much, MUCH earlier today... An emergency landing, to be precise. It was not »terror-related«, there were no victims (or even seriously injured passengers), not even a »spectacular« blaze. In short: nothing happened. It could have, but it didn't. (Thank God.)

Why, then, we have to listen about it ALL DAY LONG – and still labeled BREAKING NEWS?

(Which, by the way, is a newly introduced "improvement" on the part of Sky: they don't have »news on the hour, every hour«, not anymore - now they have »BREAKING news on the hour, every hour".
How is that possible, you ask?
Well, you take any piece of new information - what was once, not so long ago, called simply news – and you label it BREAKING NEWS... and then keep running it all day long.
If the screen is too cramped, simply remove »excess« information, like the hour... Because everyone knows at all times what the hour is, up to the minute, of course; on the other hand, you may not know that a piece of news is »breaking« unless they tell you so; also, you might forget what their email address is unless they constantly remind you of it. With such an exciting schedule, who needs to see the actual hour of the day?
Oh, and don't forget to pad the long minutes between the end of each »on the hour, every hour breaking news« and the beginning of the next round of the same with dramatically repetitive drumming and fanfare...

Apparently, the SKY masterminds never read the fable about the boy who cried wolf... In fact, I doubt very much that they read much of anything, especially not spectators' comments.)

But it's not just SKY anymore; even BBC, usually focused on anything except life in Europe, kept recycling the news about the airport non-event with astounding persistence.


As for CNN... Gimme a break. ;)

Who watches CNN anymore?
(Well, except for the occasional Anderson Cooper 360 – he's alright – and the occasional Larry King Live, which, interestingly, works much better in transcripts than »live« (except when he is hosting some of his more flamboyant guests, like Sylvia Browne – that's actually worth seeing.).

Why am I ranting about this?

Because I have a special interest in the media and/or any other instruments of mass manipulation (I do not mean this in a necessarily ominous way; I am just deeply interested in the human psyche.)

And because interesting things seem to be happening »out there«. In Texas, to be precise, where apparently a »mile-long« unknown flying object was spotted hovering over a town, with scores of witnesses, including a pilot and a law enforcement officer; and at the Arecibo observatory, where a »mysterious signal« from the outer space was picked yesterday.

Regardless of what they are, at least they are legitimate stories.

Why, then, we have to watch and listen to reports about a literal non-event at London airport? (By the way, I am pretty sure there were other accidents, including fatal ones, somewhere in the world... just not in the »first« world.)

No, really: I am asking you.




Monday, 7 January 2008

The Shortest Drama Ever Told


You may have read the "post" below on a different blog. But we find it irresistible, so we just had to repost it here. (Consider it "syndication".)
And yes, we DO have the explicit permission of the author.



The Shortest Drama Ever Told

Have you ever noticed, when people discuss or are encouraged (think Oprah) to "pursue" their »wildest dreams«, that the latter mostly turn out to be a beautiful car, a vacation in Hawaii (or insert the location of you choice), perhaps »even« a new home...?

It's poignant, of course, that people have such low standards in matter of »dreams«.

So, what follows is the shortest nail-biter you'll ever read.



FAUST, PhD

ACT I, SCENE I



FAUST: I'd give anything to have my wildest dreams fulfilled!

A flash of dark light appears.


DEVIL: Anything?

FAUST: Anything.

DEVIL: I can fulfill your wildest dreams, and beyond. And I shall, if you give me your most prized possession.

FAUST: My Blackberry?!

DEVIL: I was thinking more in the line of your soul. But I see now that, in your case, the Blackberry would probably be a wiser choice...


OK, that was NOT the version I was talking about!
My evil twin wrote the exchange above.
Here is the original one:




FAUST, PhD

ACT I, SCENE I




FAUST: I'd give anything to have my wildest dreams fulfilled!

A flash of dark light appears.



DEVIL: Anything?

FAUST: Anything.

DEVIL: I can fulfill your wildest dreams, and beyond. And I shall, if you give me your most prized possession.

FAUST: You name it.

DEVIL: You know what it is - you name it.

FAUST: And what if you can't deliver?

DEVIL: Do you have any idea of who I am? The »impossible« does not exist, not in my realm.

FAUST: That's because your dreams aren't wild enough.

DEVIL: Alright. I'll hand you over my power. I'll hand you my very self.

FAUST: It's a deal.

DEVIL: What is it that you want?

FAUST: Make me God.

A flash of dark light reappears.
We never find out what happens next.




Got a Question?


That's a question you'll be asked A LOT if you visit this or any of our other currently visible semi-occasional-blogs - and yes, we do have some which are currently invisible: think of us as the
Stealth (Sex)Bomber Squadron. ;)

God... It's difficult enough to coordinate the time and mind frequencies of a single blogger - let alone plan a conjunct action by a "posy" of wildly brainstorming furies! That - and the small matter of our,
ahem, very exciting transcontinental private lives - explains why we blog once in a blue moon...
But, since that is unlikely to change in the very near future, we thought it'd be a good idea to kick-start our multitasking service (more on that later) by setting up a
website dedicated to answering questions: all kinds of questions (except anything that has to do with math or math-related subjects).

The website is not quite ready to go (and it won't be very fancy anyway). We will let you know when it is. But in the meantime, you can ask your question from right
here.

Write to this address:

Myosotis.infoATgmail.com

and within 24 hours we will either send you our answer - or let you you know if it is above us (and advise you on the range of possible solutions).

We would prefer questions regarding everyday life, personal growth, health, beauty and style (one of our pet subjects), interpersonal relations, internet and/or communication skills (another pet subject), art (including
connoisseurship*), philosophy, theology, literature, history, perfumes, archaeology, aromatherapy, alternative therapies, old Hollywood (we are not too crazy about the "new" one), WW I or II, the fine art of traveling, "manifesting", the Titanic... you name it. But in reality, ANY question - unless it deals with illegal activities - will be perfectly welcome.


WE WANT TO BE

YOUR ONE-STOP FRIEND
.

And so, we happen to believe there are no "trivial" questions: if it's bugging you, it deserves an answer. And we're willing and happy to give your question all the consideration it needs.
If a question is clearly above us, we will let you know within 24 hours.

* The first answer is
free (no strings attached, although it may be - maybe not - less than exhaustive if the question addresses a complicated subject or situation);

* The second one (if there is one), YOU will decide how much is it worth to you; just drop your amount in our tip jar (Paypal). We don't keep count of who gave what or how much - and our treatment of people certainly doesn't depend on the amount donated.

* The third answer will have a set price: from 15 $ up to 50 $, depending on the subject or situation. (We will let you know the price BEFORE we answer, after we've evaluated the implications of the question.)

SIMPLE follow-up questions (following a paid reply) will be free of charge, or the payment may be left to your discretion, depending on the case.

(Oh and by the way: if your question falls in the category best summarised as "hiya there, how are you doing?", we don't charge for our reply - EVER. :))

For that price range you will be getting a HIGHLY personalised, tailor-made advice - including information that you are unlikely to find anywhere else.

(But this depends strictly on the type of question. For example, we know rather simple and inexpensive beauty "tricks" that we haven't seen anywhere else on the web - although we did commit the mistake of sharing a major secret or two free of charge... We simply don't dare googling for it, to see whether someone has been marketing it - and our goodwill - for cash. Anger and disappointment are poison, which is why we avoid them.)

We will also be offering
personalised permanent guidance

(usually called "coaching").
But more on that in the future.


Certainly our answers, even at this stage, will be highly personalised, literally one-on-one.
Which is why we consider the current price range a truly
exceptional bargain.
You will be addressing us as
Myosotis - but if you knew what exactly (in terms of quality) you are getting for your money, you wouldn't believe it. ;)

(You see, contrary to popular belief, not only "losers" hang around the WWW. After all... YOU are here, right? And, also contrary to a widely spread misconception:

a) there isn't really an Olympus or a Pantheon where the high and mighty - or just celebs for no good reason - hang around, never casting as much as a single glance towards the foggy netherland of ordinary, plebeian internet users;

b) there CAN be such a thing as a "free lunch". Perhaps not an epicurean banquet with seven courses, not counting the stuffed camel, but certainly
very, VERY healthy and nutritious. ;)


You can send your questions in
any European language.
True, we will only understand
some of them - and we'll be able to reply in even fewer of them... :)
But it's not a gimmick.

We know that people express themselves much better when they write in their "first" language. so, even if we aren't able to reply in your chosen language, the question itself may be more transparent (not to mention more comfortable) if you are writing in your own language.

Needless to say, we don't mind AT ALL if you do write in English, regardless of your mother tongue.

(And BTW, we are hoping to be able to offer language-specific advice to Japanese-writing visitors, too. But only time will tell. We are not quite there yet. One of us Myosotis girls grew up in Japan - but that was kinda... long ago. ;))


And regarding the offer: the first question for free, the second one you decide, etc... We are very excited about this approach. We like it - and we think, certainly hope, you'll like it, too. Especially after you've gotten an answer from us.
But we just have to let you know, as friends to a friend: we really
are smart cookies, just like you. We know all the tricks in the bag. ;)
Of course we won't be sending the police after you for asking more than one question in disguise (like, using different email addresses - oh yeah, we can tell :), perish the thought!... But it's really not good "karma".
Generosity requires a simple thank you for its reward.

Abusing it never leads to any lasting good.

And by the way: if you really NEED advice and you REALLY cannot afford to pay for it... say so.
Ask.

After all, surely there were occasions when you too have been really, REALLY generous with your time and knowledge - free of charge. Right...?

Good.
So that's that.

Looking forward to hearing from you!



P.S.
Have your sense of humour ready. You might need it. ;)



* When we say
connoisseurship, we mean connoisseurship: we know a thing or two about art & stuff. It does NOT mean that we are going to offer very profound opinions on authorship, or even authenticity, of artworks - certainly not for 50$. ;)